diff --git a/doc/source/users/faq.rst b/doc/source/users/faq.rst
index 9f9511b..78c690d 100644
--- a/doc/source/users/faq.rst
+++ b/doc/source/users/faq.rst
@@ -112,9 +112,9 @@ asked.
   Consequently, for short observation times (below 30 hours), unbinned
   analysis is faster, while for longer times it is advantageous to use
   a binned analysis.
-  If you want to take the energy dispersion into account (which is required
-  if your analysis covers the lowest energies), you need to use unbinned
-  analysis, since binned analysis does not yet implement energy dispersion.
+  If you go to very low energies, either make sure that you have enough
+  energy bins in a binned analysis to sample properly the strong drop in the
+  effective area towards small energies, or better, use unbinned analysis.
   If you'd like to fit a Gaussian line to your data you may also prefer
   unbinned over binned analysis, as the fine sampling required to resolve
   the line may require a prohibitive large number of energy bins for a binned
diff --git a/doc/source/users/user_manual/iact_analysis/analysis.rst b/doc/source/users/user_manual/iact_analysis/analysis.rst
index b599678..2b9e3ed 100644
--- a/doc/source/users/user_manual/iact_analysis/analysis.rst
+++ b/doc/source/users/user_manual/iact_analysis/analysis.rst
@@ -450,8 +450,6 @@ Having all the intermediate data products ready, a binned analysis can be conduc
 Note that when passing an event cube to :ref:`ctlike`, the tool behaves differently than in unbinned mode.
 It queries directly for the additional ingredients for the binned analysis. It is important to pass the background model
 generated by :ref:`ctbkgcube` here to ensure the proper modelling of the background in the fit.
-The usage of energy dispersion cannot be included in binned analyses yet. Therefore, the hidden parameter ``edisp=yes``
-has no effect in this case.