Commit 8caa108d061f8500dd830485f960449b2882e926
1 parent
ec4f7835
Updated FAQ and list of Known Issues.
Showing
2 changed files
with
27 additions
and
5 deletions
doc/source/faq.rst
| ... | ... | @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ asked. |
| 16 | 16 | - :ref:`Are ctools and GammaLib specific to CTA? <faq_instruments>` |
| 17 | 17 | - :ref:`I want to upgrade ctools, do I have to upgrade GammaLib? <faq_upgrade>` |
| 18 | 18 | - :ref:`Why does my ctool complain about missing parameters? <faq_pars>` |
| 19 | +- :ref:`Should I used binned or unbinned analysis? <faq_analysis>` | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 21 | |
| 21 | 22 | .. _faq_ctools_gammalib: |
| ... | ... | @@ -96,3 +97,25 @@ asked. |
| 96 | 97 | your pfiles folder. Simply erasing all files in the pfiles folder should |
| 97 | 98 | fix this problem. |
| 98 | 99 | |
| 100 | + | |
| 101 | +.. _faq_analysis: | |
| 102 | + | |
| 103 | +.. topic:: Should I used binned or unbinned analysis? | |
| 104 | + | |
| 105 | + This depends on the amount of data you want to analyse and to some extent | |
| 106 | + on the question you want to answer with your analysis. | |
| 107 | + For an unbinned analysis, the computation time increases about linearly | |
| 108 | + with the number of events and hence with the duration of the observation, | |
| 109 | + while for binned analysis the computation time depends only on the number | |
| 110 | + of bins that is used. | |
| 111 | + Consequently, for short observation times (below 30 hours), unbinned | |
| 112 | + analysis is faster, while for longer times it is advantageous to use | |
| 113 | + a binned analysis. | |
| 114 | + If you want to take the energy dispersion into account (which is required | |
| 115 | + if your analysis covers the lowest energies), you need to use unbinned | |
| 116 | + analysis, since binned analysis does not yet implement energy dispersion. | |
| 117 | + If you'd like to fit a Gaussian line to your data you may also prefer | |
| 118 | + unbinned over binned analysis, as the fine sampling required to resolve | |
| 119 | + the line may require a prohibitive large number of energy bins for a binned | |
| 120 | + analysis. | |
| 121 | + | ... | ... |
doc/source/issues.rst
| ... | ... | @@ -41,8 +41,7 @@ Below you will find a list of known issues. |
| 41 | 41 | When performing a binned or stacked analysis you should make sure |
| 42 | 42 | that the spatial and spectral binning is sufficiently fine grained. |
| 43 | 43 | The spatial binning should be better than the best angular resolution |
| 44 | - over the energy range of interest. Use a typical value of 0.02 degrees. | |
| 45 | - For the spectral binning, use at least 5 bins per decade. | |
| 46 | - If the binning is too coarse, the spectral parameters will be biased. | |
| 47 | - For example, a spectral hardening is observed when using a coarser | |
| 48 | - spatial binning. | |
| 44 | + over the energy range of interest. Use a typical value of 0.02 degrees | |
| 45 | + per pixel for the spatial binning and 10 bins per decade for the | |
| 46 | + spectral binning. If the binning is too coarse, the spectral parameters | |
| 47 | + that are fitted will be biased. | ... | ... |