Commit 63473779cd1d4366caef70d91324751492ba7c59

Authored by Jürgen Knödlseder
1 parent a587b6cb

Add information about Fermi/LAT and COMPTEL response to User manual

doc/source/users/user_manual/irf.rst
@@ -8,3 +8,5 @@ Instrument Response Functions @@ -8,3 +8,5 @@ Instrument Response Functions
8 8
9 irf_intro 9 irf_intro
10 irf_cta 10 irf_cta
  11 + irf_lat
  12 + irf_comptel
doc/source/users/user_manual/irf_comptel.rst 0 → 100755
  1 +.. _um_irf_comptel:
  2 +
  3 +COMPTEL response functions
  4 +--------------------------
  5 +
  6 +Formulation
  7 +~~~~~~~~~~~
  8 +
  9 +A COMPTEL event is characterised by an instrument direction spanned by the
  10 +angles :math:`(\chi, \psi, \bar{\varphi})`. :math:`(\chi, \psi)` is the
  11 +direction of the photon after scattering in the upper detector plane, which is
  12 +determined from the photon interaction locations in both detector planes, and
  13 +
  14 +.. math::
  15 + \bar{\varphi} = \arccos \left( 1 - \frac{m_\mathrm{e}c^2}{E_2} + \frac{m_\mathrm{e}c^2}{E_1+E_2} \right)
  16 +
  17 +is the Compton scattering angle as inferred from the energy deposits :math:`E_1`
  18 +and :math:`E_2` in the upper and lower detector planes, respectively.
  19 +The measured energy of the photon is estimated from the sum
  20 +
  21 +.. math::
  22 + E' = E_1 + E_2
  23 +
  24 +of the energy deposits in both detector planes. The probability that a photon
  25 +which interacted in the upper detector plane will encounter a detector of the
  26 +lower plane is described by :math:`DRG(\chi, \psi, \bar{\varphi})`, which also
  27 +includes any cuts related to the removal of events coming from the Earth limb.
  28 +
  29 +The COMPTEL response is factorised using
  30 +
  31 +.. math::
  32 + R(p',E',t'|p,E,t) = \frac{DRX(p)}{T} \times DRG(\chi, \psi, \bar{\varphi})
  33 + \times IAQ(\chi, \psi, \bar{\varphi} | p, E)
  34 +
  35 +where
  36 +:math:`DRX(p)` is the exposure in units of :math:`cm^2 \, s`,
  37 +:math:`T` is the ontime in units of :math:`s`, and
  38 +:math:`IAQ(\chi, \psi, \bar{\varphi} | p, E)` quantifies the interaction
  39 +probability for a Compton scattering in the upper detector plane followed by
  40 +an interaction in the lower detector plane.
  41 +
  42 +
  43 +We note that :math:`IAQ(\chi, \psi, \bar{\varphi} | p, E)` is azimuthally
  44 +symmetric about the source direction, and the IAQ file is stored as a 2D FITS
  45 +image providing the interaction probabilities as function of
  46 +:math:`\bar{\varphi}` and :math:`\varphi_\mathrm{geo}` for a given energy
  47 +range, where :math:`\varphi_\mathrm{geo}` is the angular separation between
  48 +:math:`(\chi, \psi)` and :math:`p`.
doc/source/users/user_manual/irf_cta.rst
@@ -3,31 +3,45 @@ @@ -3,31 +3,45 @@
3 CTA response functions 3 CTA response functions
4 ---------------------- 4 ----------------------
5 5
6 -Factorisation  
7 -~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 6 +Formulation
  7 +~~~~~~~~~~~
8 8
9 The instrument response functions for CTA (as well as the other IACTs such as 9 The instrument response functions for CTA (as well as the other IACTs such as
10 H.E.S.S., VERITAS and MAGIC) are factorised into 10 H.E.S.S., VERITAS and MAGIC) are factorised into
11 -the effective area :math:`A_{\rm eff}(p, E, t)` (units :math:`cm^2`),  
12 -the point spread function :math:`PSF(p' | p, E, t)`,  
13 -and the energy dispersion :math:`E_{\rm disp}(E' | p, E, t)` 11 +the effective area :math:`A_{\rm eff}(p,E,t)` (units :math:`cm^2`),
  12 +the point spread function :math:`PSF(p'|p,E,t)`,
  13 +and the energy dispersion :math:`E_{\rm disp}(E'|p,E,t)`
14 following 14 following
15 15
16 .. math:: 16 .. math::
17 - R(p', E', t' | p, E, t) =  
18 - A_{\rm eff}(p, E, t) \times  
19 - PSF(p' | p, E, t) \times  
20 - E_{\rm disp}(E' | p, E, t) 17 + R(p',E',t'|p,E,t) = A_{\rm eff}(p,E,t) \times PSF(p'|p,E,t) \times
  18 + E_{\rm disp}(E'|p,E,t)
21 19
22 where 20 where
23 21
24 .. math:: 22 .. math::
25 - \int PSF(p' | p, E, t) dp' = 1 23 + \int PSF(p'|p,E,t) \, dp' = 1
26 24
27 and 25 and
28 26
29 .. math:: 27 .. math::
30 - \int E_{\rm disp}(E' | p, E, t) dE' = 1 28 + \int E_{\rm disp}(E'|p,E,t) \, dE' = 1
  29 +
  30 +For the point spread function, two variants exist that both depend on energy
  31 +and off-axis angle, but differ in the functional form that is used to describe
  32 +the PSF. The first variant implements a superposition of three 2D Gaussian
  33 +functions that are each characterised by a width and a relative amplitude.
  34 +Alternatively, a King profile defined by
  35 +
  36 +.. math::
  37 + \mathrm{\it PSF}(p'|p,E,t) = \frac{1}{2 \pi \sigma^2}
  38 + \left( 1 - \frac{1}{\gamma} \right)
  39 + \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2 \gamma} \frac{\delta^2}{\sigma^2} \right)^{-\gamma}
  40 +
  41 +can be used, where :math:`\delta` is the angular separation between the true
  42 +and measured photon directions :math:`p` and :math:`p'`, respectively,
  43 +:math:`\sigma` describes the width and :math:`\gamma` the tail of the
  44 +distribution.
31 45
32 46
33 Format 47 Format
doc/source/users/user_manual/irf_lat.rst 0 → 100755
  1 +.. _um_irf_lat:
  2 +
  3 +Fermi/LAT response functions
  4 +----------------------------
  5 +
  6 +Formulation
  7 +~~~~~~~~~~~
  8 +
  9 +The instrument response functions for Fermi/LAT are factorised into
  10 +the effective area :math:`A_{\rm eff}(p,\theta)` (units :math:`cm^2`),
  11 +the point spread function :math:`PSF(\delta|E,\theta)`,
  12 +and the energy dispersion :math:`E_{\rm disp}(E'|E,\theta)`
  13 +following
  14 +
  15 +.. math::
  16 + R(p',E',t'|p,E,t) = A_{\rm eff}(p,\theta) \times PSF(\delta|E,\theta)
  17 + \times E_{\rm disp}(E'|E,\theta)
  18 +
  19 +where :math:`\theta` is the inclination angle with respect to the LAT z-axis,
  20 +and :math:`\delta` is the angular separation between the true and measured
  21 +photon directions :math:`p` and :math:`p'`, respectively,
  22 +
  23 +.. math::
  24 + \int PSF(p'|p,E,t) \, dp' = 1
  25 +
  26 +and
  27 +
  28 +.. math::
  29 + \int E_{\rm disp}(E'|p,E,t) \, dE' = 1
  30 +
  31 +The instrument response function is independent of time.
  32 +
  33 +Two functional forms are available for the point spread function which are both
  34 +composed of a superposition of two King functions:
  35 +
  36 +.. math::
  37 + \mathrm{\it PSF}_1(\delta | E, \theta) =
  38 + n_\mathrm{c}
  39 + \left( 1-\frac{1}{\gamma_\mathrm{c}} \right)
  40 + \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2\gamma_\mathrm{c}} \frac{\delta^2}{\sigma^2} \right)^{-\gamma_\mathrm{c}}
  41 + + n_\mathrm{t}
  42 + \left( 1-\frac{1}{\gamma_\mathrm{t}} \right)
  43 + \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2\gamma_\mathrm{t}} \frac{\delta^2}{\sigma^2} \right)^{-\gamma_\mathrm{t}}
  44 +
  45 +and
  46 +
  47 +.. math::
  48 + \mathrm{\it PSF}_3(\delta | E, \theta) =
  49 + n_\mathrm{c}
  50 + \left(
  51 + \left( 1-\frac{1}{\gamma_\mathrm{c}} \right)
  52 + \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2\gamma_\mathrm{c}} \frac{\delta^2}{s_\mathrm{c}^2} \right)^{-\gamma_\mathrm{c}} \right.
  53 + \left.
  54 + + n_\mathrm{t}
  55 + \left( 1-\frac{1}{\gamma_\mathrm{t}} \right)
  56 + \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2\gamma_\mathrm{t}} \frac{\delta^2}{s_\mathrm{t}^2} \right)^{-\gamma_\mathrm{t}}
  57 + \right).
  58 +
  59 +The parameters :math:`n_\mathrm{c}`, :math:`n_\mathrm{t}`, :math:`s_\mathrm{c}`,
  60 +:math:`s_\mathrm{t}`, :math:`\sigma`, :math:`\gamma_\mathrm{c}`,
  61 +:math:`\gamma_\mathrm{t}` depend on energy :math:`E` and off-axis angle
  62 +:math:`\theta`.
  63 +Energy dispersion is so far not implemented.