Commit 63473779cd1d4366caef70d91324751492ba7c59
1 parent
a587b6cb
Add information about Fermi/LAT and COMPTEL response to User manual
Showing
4 changed files
with
138 additions
and
11 deletions
doc/source/users/user_manual/irf.rst
doc/source/users/user_manual/irf_comptel.rst
0 → 100755
| 1 | +.. _um_irf_comptel: | ||
| 2 | + | ||
| 3 | +COMPTEL response functions | ||
| 4 | +-------------------------- | ||
| 5 | + | ||
| 6 | +Formulation | ||
| 7 | +~~~~~~~~~~~ | ||
| 8 | + | ||
| 9 | +A COMPTEL event is characterised by an instrument direction spanned by the | ||
| 10 | +angles :math:`(\chi, \psi, \bar{\varphi})`. :math:`(\chi, \psi)` is the | ||
| 11 | +direction of the photon after scattering in the upper detector plane, which is | ||
| 12 | +determined from the photon interaction locations in both detector planes, and | ||
| 13 | + | ||
| 14 | +.. math:: | ||
| 15 | + \bar{\varphi} = \arccos \left( 1 - \frac{m_\mathrm{e}c^2}{E_2} + \frac{m_\mathrm{e}c^2}{E_1+E_2} \right) | ||
| 16 | + | ||
| 17 | +is the Compton scattering angle as inferred from the energy deposits :math:`E_1` | ||
| 18 | +and :math:`E_2` in the upper and lower detector planes, respectively. | ||
| 19 | +The measured energy of the photon is estimated from the sum | ||
| 20 | + | ||
| 21 | +.. math:: | ||
| 22 | + E' = E_1 + E_2 | ||
| 23 | + | ||
| 24 | +of the energy deposits in both detector planes. The probability that a photon | ||
| 25 | +which interacted in the upper detector plane will encounter a detector of the | ||
| 26 | +lower plane is described by :math:`DRG(\chi, \psi, \bar{\varphi})`, which also | ||
| 27 | +includes any cuts related to the removal of events coming from the Earth limb. | ||
| 28 | + | ||
| 29 | +The COMPTEL response is factorised using | ||
| 30 | + | ||
| 31 | +.. math:: | ||
| 32 | + R(p',E',t'|p,E,t) = \frac{DRX(p)}{T} \times DRG(\chi, \psi, \bar{\varphi}) | ||
| 33 | + \times IAQ(\chi, \psi, \bar{\varphi} | p, E) | ||
| 34 | + | ||
| 35 | +where | ||
| 36 | +:math:`DRX(p)` is the exposure in units of :math:`cm^2 \, s`, | ||
| 37 | +:math:`T` is the ontime in units of :math:`s`, and | ||
| 38 | +:math:`IAQ(\chi, \psi, \bar{\varphi} | p, E)` quantifies the interaction | ||
| 39 | +probability for a Compton scattering in the upper detector plane followed by | ||
| 40 | +an interaction in the lower detector plane. | ||
| 41 | + | ||
| 42 | + | ||
| 43 | +We note that :math:`IAQ(\chi, \psi, \bar{\varphi} | p, E)` is azimuthally | ||
| 44 | +symmetric about the source direction, and the IAQ file is stored as a 2D FITS | ||
| 45 | +image providing the interaction probabilities as function of | ||
| 46 | +:math:`\bar{\varphi}` and :math:`\varphi_\mathrm{geo}` for a given energy | ||
| 47 | +range, where :math:`\varphi_\mathrm{geo}` is the angular separation between | ||
| 48 | +:math:`(\chi, \psi)` and :math:`p`. |
doc/source/users/user_manual/irf_cta.rst
| @@ -3,31 +3,45 @@ | @@ -3,31 +3,45 @@ | ||
| 3 | CTA response functions | 3 | CTA response functions |
| 4 | ---------------------- | 4 | ---------------------- |
| 5 | 5 | ||
| 6 | -Factorisation | ||
| 7 | -~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 6 | +Formulation |
| 7 | +~~~~~~~~~~~ | ||
| 8 | 8 | ||
| 9 | The instrument response functions for CTA (as well as the other IACTs such as | 9 | The instrument response functions for CTA (as well as the other IACTs such as |
| 10 | H.E.S.S., VERITAS and MAGIC) are factorised into | 10 | H.E.S.S., VERITAS and MAGIC) are factorised into |
| 11 | -the effective area :math:`A_{\rm eff}(p, E, t)` (units :math:`cm^2`), | ||
| 12 | -the point spread function :math:`PSF(p' | p, E, t)`, | ||
| 13 | -and the energy dispersion :math:`E_{\rm disp}(E' | p, E, t)` | 11 | +the effective area :math:`A_{\rm eff}(p,E,t)` (units :math:`cm^2`), |
| 12 | +the point spread function :math:`PSF(p'|p,E,t)`, | ||
| 13 | +and the energy dispersion :math:`E_{\rm disp}(E'|p,E,t)` | ||
| 14 | following | 14 | following |
| 15 | 15 | ||
| 16 | .. math:: | 16 | .. math:: |
| 17 | - R(p', E', t' | p, E, t) = | ||
| 18 | - A_{\rm eff}(p, E, t) \times | ||
| 19 | - PSF(p' | p, E, t) \times | ||
| 20 | - E_{\rm disp}(E' | p, E, t) | 17 | + R(p',E',t'|p,E,t) = A_{\rm eff}(p,E,t) \times PSF(p'|p,E,t) \times |
| 18 | + E_{\rm disp}(E'|p,E,t) | ||
| 21 | 19 | ||
| 22 | where | 20 | where |
| 23 | 21 | ||
| 24 | .. math:: | 22 | .. math:: |
| 25 | - \int PSF(p' | p, E, t) dp' = 1 | 23 | + \int PSF(p'|p,E,t) \, dp' = 1 |
| 26 | 24 | ||
| 27 | and | 25 | and |
| 28 | 26 | ||
| 29 | .. math:: | 27 | .. math:: |
| 30 | - \int E_{\rm disp}(E' | p, E, t) dE' = 1 | 28 | + \int E_{\rm disp}(E'|p,E,t) \, dE' = 1 |
| 29 | + | ||
| 30 | +For the point spread function, two variants exist that both depend on energy | ||
| 31 | +and off-axis angle, but differ in the functional form that is used to describe | ||
| 32 | +the PSF. The first variant implements a superposition of three 2D Gaussian | ||
| 33 | +functions that are each characterised by a width and a relative amplitude. | ||
| 34 | +Alternatively, a King profile defined by | ||
| 35 | + | ||
| 36 | +.. math:: | ||
| 37 | + \mathrm{\it PSF}(p'|p,E,t) = \frac{1}{2 \pi \sigma^2} | ||
| 38 | + \left( 1 - \frac{1}{\gamma} \right) | ||
| 39 | + \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2 \gamma} \frac{\delta^2}{\sigma^2} \right)^{-\gamma} | ||
| 40 | + | ||
| 41 | +can be used, where :math:`\delta` is the angular separation between the true | ||
| 42 | +and measured photon directions :math:`p` and :math:`p'`, respectively, | ||
| 43 | +:math:`\sigma` describes the width and :math:`\gamma` the tail of the | ||
| 44 | +distribution. | ||
| 31 | 45 | ||
| 32 | 46 | ||
| 33 | Format | 47 | Format |
doc/source/users/user_manual/irf_lat.rst
0 → 100755
| 1 | +.. _um_irf_lat: | ||
| 2 | + | ||
| 3 | +Fermi/LAT response functions | ||
| 4 | +---------------------------- | ||
| 5 | + | ||
| 6 | +Formulation | ||
| 7 | +~~~~~~~~~~~ | ||
| 8 | + | ||
| 9 | +The instrument response functions for Fermi/LAT are factorised into | ||
| 10 | +the effective area :math:`A_{\rm eff}(p,\theta)` (units :math:`cm^2`), | ||
| 11 | +the point spread function :math:`PSF(\delta|E,\theta)`, | ||
| 12 | +and the energy dispersion :math:`E_{\rm disp}(E'|E,\theta)` | ||
| 13 | +following | ||
| 14 | + | ||
| 15 | +.. math:: | ||
| 16 | + R(p',E',t'|p,E,t) = A_{\rm eff}(p,\theta) \times PSF(\delta|E,\theta) | ||
| 17 | + \times E_{\rm disp}(E'|E,\theta) | ||
| 18 | + | ||
| 19 | +where :math:`\theta` is the inclination angle with respect to the LAT z-axis, | ||
| 20 | +and :math:`\delta` is the angular separation between the true and measured | ||
| 21 | +photon directions :math:`p` and :math:`p'`, respectively, | ||
| 22 | + | ||
| 23 | +.. math:: | ||
| 24 | + \int PSF(p'|p,E,t) \, dp' = 1 | ||
| 25 | + | ||
| 26 | +and | ||
| 27 | + | ||
| 28 | +.. math:: | ||
| 29 | + \int E_{\rm disp}(E'|p,E,t) \, dE' = 1 | ||
| 30 | + | ||
| 31 | +The instrument response function is independent of time. | ||
| 32 | + | ||
| 33 | +Two functional forms are available for the point spread function which are both | ||
| 34 | +composed of a superposition of two King functions: | ||
| 35 | + | ||
| 36 | +.. math:: | ||
| 37 | + \mathrm{\it PSF}_1(\delta | E, \theta) = | ||
| 38 | + n_\mathrm{c} | ||
| 39 | + \left( 1-\frac{1}{\gamma_\mathrm{c}} \right) | ||
| 40 | + \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2\gamma_\mathrm{c}} \frac{\delta^2}{\sigma^2} \right)^{-\gamma_\mathrm{c}} | ||
| 41 | + + n_\mathrm{t} | ||
| 42 | + \left( 1-\frac{1}{\gamma_\mathrm{t}} \right) | ||
| 43 | + \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2\gamma_\mathrm{t}} \frac{\delta^2}{\sigma^2} \right)^{-\gamma_\mathrm{t}} | ||
| 44 | + | ||
| 45 | +and | ||
| 46 | + | ||
| 47 | +.. math:: | ||
| 48 | + \mathrm{\it PSF}_3(\delta | E, \theta) = | ||
| 49 | + n_\mathrm{c} | ||
| 50 | + \left( | ||
| 51 | + \left( 1-\frac{1}{\gamma_\mathrm{c}} \right) | ||
| 52 | + \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2\gamma_\mathrm{c}} \frac{\delta^2}{s_\mathrm{c}^2} \right)^{-\gamma_\mathrm{c}} \right. | ||
| 53 | + \left. | ||
| 54 | + + n_\mathrm{t} | ||
| 55 | + \left( 1-\frac{1}{\gamma_\mathrm{t}} \right) | ||
| 56 | + \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2\gamma_\mathrm{t}} \frac{\delta^2}{s_\mathrm{t}^2} \right)^{-\gamma_\mathrm{t}} | ||
| 57 | + \right). | ||
| 58 | + | ||
| 59 | +The parameters :math:`n_\mathrm{c}`, :math:`n_\mathrm{t}`, :math:`s_\mathrm{c}`, | ||
| 60 | +:math:`s_\mathrm{t}`, :math:`\sigma`, :math:`\gamma_\mathrm{c}`, | ||
| 61 | +:math:`\gamma_\mathrm{t}` depend on energy :math:`E` and off-axis angle | ||
| 62 | +:math:`\theta`. | ||
| 63 | +Energy dispersion is so far not implemented. |