Commit 63473779cd1d4366caef70d91324751492ba7c59

Authored by Jürgen Knödlseder
1 parent a587b6cb

Add information about Fermi/LAT and COMPTEL response to User manual

doc/source/users/user_manual/irf.rst
... ... @@ -8,3 +8,5 @@ Instrument Response Functions
8 8  
9 9 irf_intro
10 10 irf_cta
  11 + irf_lat
  12 + irf_comptel
... ...
doc/source/users/user_manual/irf_comptel.rst 0 → 100755
  1 +.. _um_irf_comptel:
  2 +
  3 +COMPTEL response functions
  4 +--------------------------
  5 +
  6 +Formulation
  7 +~~~~~~~~~~~
  8 +
  9 +A COMPTEL event is characterised by an instrument direction spanned by the
  10 +angles :math:`(\chi, \psi, \bar{\varphi})`. :math:`(\chi, \psi)` is the
  11 +direction of the photon after scattering in the upper detector plane, which is
  12 +determined from the photon interaction locations in both detector planes, and
  13 +
  14 +.. math::
  15 + \bar{\varphi} = \arccos \left( 1 - \frac{m_\mathrm{e}c^2}{E_2} + \frac{m_\mathrm{e}c^2}{E_1+E_2} \right)
  16 +
  17 +is the Compton scattering angle as inferred from the energy deposits :math:`E_1`
  18 +and :math:`E_2` in the upper and lower detector planes, respectively.
  19 +The measured energy of the photon is estimated from the sum
  20 +
  21 +.. math::
  22 + E' = E_1 + E_2
  23 +
  24 +of the energy deposits in both detector planes. The probability that a photon
  25 +which interacted in the upper detector plane will encounter a detector of the
  26 +lower plane is described by :math:`DRG(\chi, \psi, \bar{\varphi})`, which also
  27 +includes any cuts related to the removal of events coming from the Earth limb.
  28 +
  29 +The COMPTEL response is factorised using
  30 +
  31 +.. math::
  32 + R(p',E',t'|p,E,t) = \frac{DRX(p)}{T} \times DRG(\chi, \psi, \bar{\varphi})
  33 + \times IAQ(\chi, \psi, \bar{\varphi} | p, E)
  34 +
  35 +where
  36 +:math:`DRX(p)` is the exposure in units of :math:`cm^2 \, s`,
  37 +:math:`T` is the ontime in units of :math:`s`, and
  38 +:math:`IAQ(\chi, \psi, \bar{\varphi} | p, E)` quantifies the interaction
  39 +probability for a Compton scattering in the upper detector plane followed by
  40 +an interaction in the lower detector plane.
  41 +
  42 +
  43 +We note that :math:`IAQ(\chi, \psi, \bar{\varphi} | p, E)` is azimuthally
  44 +symmetric about the source direction, and the IAQ file is stored as a 2D FITS
  45 +image providing the interaction probabilities as function of
  46 +:math:`\bar{\varphi}` and :math:`\varphi_\mathrm{geo}` for a given energy
  47 +range, where :math:`\varphi_\mathrm{geo}` is the angular separation between
  48 +:math:`(\chi, \psi)` and :math:`p`.
... ...
doc/source/users/user_manual/irf_cta.rst
... ... @@ -3,31 +3,45 @@
3 3 CTA response functions
4 4 ----------------------
5 5  
6   -Factorisation
7   -~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  6 +Formulation
  7 +~~~~~~~~~~~
8 8  
9 9 The instrument response functions for CTA (as well as the other IACTs such as
10 10 H.E.S.S., VERITAS and MAGIC) are factorised into
11   -the effective area :math:`A_{\rm eff}(p, E, t)` (units :math:`cm^2`),
12   -the point spread function :math:`PSF(p' | p, E, t)`,
13   -and the energy dispersion :math:`E_{\rm disp}(E' | p, E, t)`
  11 +the effective area :math:`A_{\rm eff}(p,E,t)` (units :math:`cm^2`),
  12 +the point spread function :math:`PSF(p'|p,E,t)`,
  13 +and the energy dispersion :math:`E_{\rm disp}(E'|p,E,t)`
14 14 following
15 15  
16 16 .. math::
17   - R(p', E', t' | p, E, t) =
18   - A_{\rm eff}(p, E, t) \times
19   - PSF(p' | p, E, t) \times
20   - E_{\rm disp}(E' | p, E, t)
  17 + R(p',E',t'|p,E,t) = A_{\rm eff}(p,E,t) \times PSF(p'|p,E,t) \times
  18 + E_{\rm disp}(E'|p,E,t)
21 19  
22 20 where
23 21  
24 22 .. math::
25   - \int PSF(p' | p, E, t) dp' = 1
  23 + \int PSF(p'|p,E,t) \, dp' = 1
26 24  
27 25 and
28 26  
29 27 .. math::
30   - \int E_{\rm disp}(E' | p, E, t) dE' = 1
  28 + \int E_{\rm disp}(E'|p,E,t) \, dE' = 1
  29 +
  30 +For the point spread function, two variants exist that both depend on energy
  31 +and off-axis angle, but differ in the functional form that is used to describe
  32 +the PSF. The first variant implements a superposition of three 2D Gaussian
  33 +functions that are each characterised by a width and a relative amplitude.
  34 +Alternatively, a King profile defined by
  35 +
  36 +.. math::
  37 + \mathrm{\it PSF}(p'|p,E,t) = \frac{1}{2 \pi \sigma^2}
  38 + \left( 1 - \frac{1}{\gamma} \right)
  39 + \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2 \gamma} \frac{\delta^2}{\sigma^2} \right)^{-\gamma}
  40 +
  41 +can be used, where :math:`\delta` is the angular separation between the true
  42 +and measured photon directions :math:`p` and :math:`p'`, respectively,
  43 +:math:`\sigma` describes the width and :math:`\gamma` the tail of the
  44 +distribution.
31 45  
32 46  
33 47 Format
... ...
doc/source/users/user_manual/irf_lat.rst 0 → 100755
  1 +.. _um_irf_lat:
  2 +
  3 +Fermi/LAT response functions
  4 +----------------------------
  5 +
  6 +Formulation
  7 +~~~~~~~~~~~
  8 +
  9 +The instrument response functions for Fermi/LAT are factorised into
  10 +the effective area :math:`A_{\rm eff}(p,\theta)` (units :math:`cm^2`),
  11 +the point spread function :math:`PSF(\delta|E,\theta)`,
  12 +and the energy dispersion :math:`E_{\rm disp}(E'|E,\theta)`
  13 +following
  14 +
  15 +.. math::
  16 + R(p',E',t'|p,E,t) = A_{\rm eff}(p,\theta) \times PSF(\delta|E,\theta)
  17 + \times E_{\rm disp}(E'|E,\theta)
  18 +
  19 +where :math:`\theta` is the inclination angle with respect to the LAT z-axis,
  20 +and :math:`\delta` is the angular separation between the true and measured
  21 +photon directions :math:`p` and :math:`p'`, respectively,
  22 +
  23 +.. math::
  24 + \int PSF(p'|p,E,t) \, dp' = 1
  25 +
  26 +and
  27 +
  28 +.. math::
  29 + \int E_{\rm disp}(E'|p,E,t) \, dE' = 1
  30 +
  31 +The instrument response function is independent of time.
  32 +
  33 +Two functional forms are available for the point spread function which are both
  34 +composed of a superposition of two King functions:
  35 +
  36 +.. math::
  37 + \mathrm{\it PSF}_1(\delta | E, \theta) =
  38 + n_\mathrm{c}
  39 + \left( 1-\frac{1}{\gamma_\mathrm{c}} \right)
  40 + \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2\gamma_\mathrm{c}} \frac{\delta^2}{\sigma^2} \right)^{-\gamma_\mathrm{c}}
  41 + + n_\mathrm{t}
  42 + \left( 1-\frac{1}{\gamma_\mathrm{t}} \right)
  43 + \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2\gamma_\mathrm{t}} \frac{\delta^2}{\sigma^2} \right)^{-\gamma_\mathrm{t}}
  44 +
  45 +and
  46 +
  47 +.. math::
  48 + \mathrm{\it PSF}_3(\delta | E, \theta) =
  49 + n_\mathrm{c}
  50 + \left(
  51 + \left( 1-\frac{1}{\gamma_\mathrm{c}} \right)
  52 + \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2\gamma_\mathrm{c}} \frac{\delta^2}{s_\mathrm{c}^2} \right)^{-\gamma_\mathrm{c}} \right.
  53 + \left.
  54 + + n_\mathrm{t}
  55 + \left( 1-\frac{1}{\gamma_\mathrm{t}} \right)
  56 + \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2\gamma_\mathrm{t}} \frac{\delta^2}{s_\mathrm{t}^2} \right)^{-\gamma_\mathrm{t}}
  57 + \right).
  58 +
  59 +The parameters :math:`n_\mathrm{c}`, :math:`n_\mathrm{t}`, :math:`s_\mathrm{c}`,
  60 +:math:`s_\mathrm{t}`, :math:`\sigma`, :math:`\gamma_\mathrm{c}`,
  61 +:math:`\gamma_\mathrm{t}` depend on energy :math:`E` and off-axis angle
  62 +:math:`\theta`.
  63 +Energy dispersion is so far not implemented.
... ...